CPSP uses a systemic checklist for the analysis of Research Synopsis. This checklist should be followed after writing a Research Synopsis.
| Synopsis |
Yes |
No |
Remarks |
| 1. Submitted with supervisor's
certificate |
|
|
|
2. Submission of synopsis
within:
- Six months of commencement of sub-specialty training (5 years program)
- Twelve months of commencement of training (3 years program)
- Eighteen months of commencement of training (4 years program)
|
|
|
|
| 3. Format is according to the
CPSP instruction manual |
|
|
|
| 4. The study is not being
duplicated in the same institute |
|
|
|
| 5. Does not exceed four pages of
A-4 size paper |
|
|
|
6. Statistical evaluation
- Sample size appropriate
- Duration of study appropriate for the study design (must not be less
than 6 months)
- Data analysis procedure adequate
- Appropriate statistical tests mentioned |
|
|
|
7. Bibliography
- Minimum of five references are quoted
- References are according to Vancouver style
- All references can be authenticated
- Recent references are mentioned (last 5 years) |
|
|
|
8. References
- Recent references are mentioned (last 5 years)
- Relevant references are cited
- Local references are cited |
|
|
|
| TITLE |
Yes |
No |
Remarks |
| Title is clear and precise |
|
|
|
| Relevant to the specialty |
|
|
|
| Important to the specialty |
|
|
|
| INTRODUCTION |
| Problem adequately introduced |
|
|
|
| Background explained with
relevant references |
|
|
|
| Rationale of the study clarified |
|
|
|
| Precise and in student's own
language |
|
|
|
| OBJECTIVES |
| Defined in clear, measurable
terms |
|
|
|
| MATERIALS AND
METHODS |
| Appropriate setting of the study
mentioned |
|
|
|
| Procedure for subject selection
appropriate |
|
|
|
| Data collection procedure(s)
appropriate for the problem |
|
|
|
| Proforma appropriate |
|
|
|
| Will the study use data
generated after the approval of synopsis |
|
|
|
| Ethical issues, if any,
addressed? |
|
|
|
| Synopsis |
Yes |
No |
Remarks |
| Title does not contain any
abbreviations |
|
|
|
| Title rejects objectives of the
study |
|
|
|
| Introduction highlights
purported |
|
|
|
| Objectives stated in clear,
measurable terms |
|
|
|
| Appropriate operational
definitions stated |
|
|
|
| Study design suitable for the
objectives |
|
|
|
| Sampling technique correct |
|
|
|
| Sample size appropriate |
|
|
|
| Setting of the study mentioned |
|
|
|
Data collection procedure
adequately explained
- Diagnostic criteria of cases mentioned
- Source of data clearly identified
- Steps of data collection in proper sequence
- Confounding variables controlled |
|
|
|
| Proforma appropriate |
|
|
|
| Ethical issues, if any,
addressed |
|
|
|
| Will the study use data
generated after the approval of synopsis? |
|
|
|