Nawaz Ali Dal, Qamber Ali Lighari, Zameer Hussain Laghari.
LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN APPENDECTOMY; Comparative outcome.
Professional Med J Jan ;23(11):1305-10.

Objectives of this study are to compare the outcome of the laparoscopic with open appendectomy in terms of postoperative pain, postoperative complications and hospital stay. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Place and Period of Study: This study was held in Surgical Unit-III, Liaquat University Hospital Jamshoro, from September 2013 to March 2014. Methodology: This study comprised of sixty patients admitted via outpatient department, and also through casualty department of LUHMS Jamshoro/ Hyderabad. Cases were categorized into 2 groups. Group-A for open appendectomy and group-B for laparoscopic appendectomy. Comprehensive History was obtained from each patient. Right iliac fossa site was particularly assessed for tenderness assessment at Mc: Burney’s point rigidity rebound tenderness and documented through proforma. A comprehensive review was as well performed to observe any co-morbidity. Inclusion criteria comprised of all those patients of acute appendicitis who give written consent for study after counseling, irrespective of their age and sex. Criteria for exclusion included each patient with aspects of specified peritonitis, cases with obvious mass within right iliac fossa as well as cases with pre-operative history of lower abdomen or caesarean section. Outcomes were documented in the term of terms of postoperative pain, postoperative complications and hospital stay and recorded on Performa. Data analyzing was carried out with SPSS software. Results: From totally 60 cases in our study 40 patients males (66.67%) and 20 were females (33.33%); with female to male proportion of 1:3. There was an extensive variation in age from 10 to 70 years among both groups. The mean age was 26.78 years. Both groups were symptomatically nearly similar with pain in RIF, pain initiating around umbilicus, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, fever, and modified bowel behavior, in 59 (98.33%), 45 (75%), 50 (83.33%), 35 (58.33%), 25 (41.67%), 22 (36.67%), 20 (33.33%) respectively. Clinical assessment of cases exposed tenderness at Mc Burney’s point in 59 (98.33%) cases, muscle guarding in 52 (86.67%) cases, rebound tenderness in 55 (91.67%) cases and fever in 20 (33.33%) patients. Operative period in each group was documented that ranged from 30 to 90 min. in each group. The mean operative period in OA group was 38.90+15.90 where as it was 26.30+12.96 minutes LA group. Post-operative pain severity in each group was documented. Mild pain was found in 5(16.67%) in OA group cases and 21 (70%) in LA group cases was noted, moderate pain in 22(73.33%) OA group cases and 9(30%) LA group cases was noted, severe pain was described by 3 (10%) patients in OA. The period of return to normal activity in open appendectomy ranged from 7-25 days (mean 14.8 days) as contrasted to laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) group where it varied from 7-15 days. Conclusion: In conclusion, we exhibited that LA has significant compensations over OA regarding time of hospital stay, post-operative complications & Pain.

PakMediNet -Pakistan's largest Database of Pakistani Medical Journals - http://www.pakmedinet.com