Sohail Abbas Sukhera, Saleem Ahmed.
Neonatal outcome: A comparison between epidural and general anesthesia for Cesarean sections.
Professional Med J Jan ;13(1):72-8.

The choice of anesthetic technique for cesarean sections, a common problem faced by anesthetists remains controversial. Objective: To compare the effects of epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia. To evaluate which mode is better especially keeping in mind the Apgar score of the newborn. Which was taken as the index of immediate neonatal outcome. Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: Combined Military Hospital Peshawar. Period: Six months. Material & Methods: A total of hundred patients aged between 26-35 years were selected who were under going elective cesarean section. Results: The gestational ages of the newborn were between 36 and 40 wks. The patients were divided into two groups of fifty each receiving the two modes of anesthesia. A random sampling of the patients was done. Apgar scores of the newborn babies were taken at 01 and 05 minute intervals. Computer based SPSS 8.0 was used to analyze the results and it was found that none of the babies was severely depressed, (Apgar score less t han 4 at 01-minute interval in both the groups). 2% of the cases were moderately depressed, (Apgar score 4-6 at 01-minute interval in the epidural group as compared to 10% of the cases born under general anesthesia). In the epidural group 4% of the cases had 01 minute Apgar score of less than 8 compared to 36% in the general anesthesia group. As regards the 05 minute Apgar score 6% of the patients had Apgar score less than 10 in the epidural group compared to 11% in the general anesthesia group. This showed that epidural anesthesia has an advantage over general anesthesia especially as regards 01 minute Apgar score as well as being safe for the mother. So this mode of anesthesia should be preferred.

PakMediNet -Pakistan's largest Database of Pakistani Medical Journals - http://www.pakmedinet.com